Last Verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Both federal and state legislation regulate oil and gas activities in Brazil.

      The 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution grants to the Federal Union ownership over mineral resources within the Brazilian territory, which are deemed an independent asset from the soil where they are located.

      During the nineties, certain constitutional amendments were introduced to create the basis for an open market policy and minimum state intervention in Brazilian economy. In such scenario, constitutional amendment EC No. 09/1995, which modified article 177 of the Federal Constitution, authorised the Federal Union to hire state-owned companies or private companies to perform activities related to oil and gas exploration and production. Up until then, only Petroleo Brasileiro SA – Petrobras (Petrobras), the Brazilian national oil company, had been entitled to conduct those activities.

      Such EC No. 09/1995 was followed by the enactment of Law No. 9.478/1997, also known as the Petroleum Law, which changed the entire legal regime of the oil and gas sector in Brazil.

      The Petroleum Law introduced the concession regime for the exploration and production of oil and gas in the country. Per such new approach, the government authorised different economic agents to explore and produce oil and gas under particular concession agreements, upon bid proceedings conducted by the National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP).

      Later on, the discovery in 2007 of large oil and gas reserves concentrated in the pre-salt layers encouraged the Brazilian government to enact Law No. 12.351/2010 (the Pre-Salt Law), which created a new regime for the pre-salt and strategic areas, by imposing the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) in lieu of the concession agreement that is still applicable to other areas.

      When it comes to activities related to natural gas, Law No. 11.909/2009 (the Gas Law) regulates the transportation, treatment, processing, storage, liquefaction, regasification and commercialisation of natural gas, as well as the import and export thereof.

      As to the supply of piped gas, the Brazilian Federal Constitution authorises the states to exploit either directly or through concessions the services related thereto. Therefore, such activity is regulated by the states and their respective agencies.

      It should be noted that a proposed change to the Brazilian regulatory framework for natural gas commercialisation and transportation is current under analysis at the Brazilian Congress, through the Bill of Law No. 6,102/2016 annexed to the Bill of Law 6,407/2013, which, in turn, aims to promote the Brazilian natural gas industry.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Until 1995 Petrobras, the Brazilian national oil company, used to have the operational monopoly over the activities of oil and gas exploration and production. Upon the enactment of constitutional amendment EC No. 09/1995, such monopoly was broken, so as to allow the Federal Union to hire state-owned or private companies for the performance of those activities. Accordingly, from thereon, Petrobras carries out the activities related to the oil and gas industry in free competition with private companies.

      It is important to note, however, that Law No. 13,365/2016 currently provides that Petrobras will have the preference to be the operator in the pre-salt and strategic areas, holding a minimum 30 per cent stake in any consortium formed with oil companies that win the public bid proceedings for such areas, upon the execution of a Production Sharing Agreement, with the ANP. The above-mentioned preference was regulated by Decree No. 9,041/2017, which provides the rules thereunder, being those:

      (i) Petrobras shall decide whether to participate as the operator of the offered areas, within 30 days counted from the publication of a resolution from the National Energy Policy Council (CNPE), establishing the technical and economic parameters of the blocks offered under the production sharing regime;

      (ii)  The aforementioned decision shall include the blocks and the participation percentage intended by Petrobras, which cannot be lower than 30 per cent;

      (iii) The CNPE will then propose to the Brazilian President which blocks shall be operated by Petrobras, indicating its participation in the consortium to be formed, which may range between 30 per cent and the percentage indicated by the latter. 

      Decree No. 9,041/2017 also provides that if Petrobras exercises its preferential rights, after the conclusion of the bidding round’s judgment phase, it must join the winning consortium, as the operator, if said winning consortium offered to the Brazilian Union the minimum percentage of profit oil previously specified in the tender rules. On the other hand, Petrobras will just have the option to join the winning consortium, in case such winning consortium offers to the Brazilian Union a percentage of profit oil superior to the one previously specified in the tender rules. In the last case, the winning consortium must indicate to ANP’s approval the operator and the percentages of participation of each of its parties.

      It shall be highlighted that, if Petrobras opts not to exercise its preferential rights, it may than participate in the bid round, but in equal conditions with the other participants, having the option to do it as a party of a consortium or independently. 

      Finally, a stated-owned company, Empresa Brasileira de Administracao de Petroleo e Gas Natural SA – Pre-Sal Petroleo SA – PPSA (PPSA), was created with the task of managing the PSAs.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      The regulatory agencies charged with regulating oil and gas activities in Brazil are the following:

      Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME)

      The MME is the federal government body in charge of formulating public policies for the oil and gas industry, as well as for other sectors such as electric power, nuclear power, metallurgy, etc.

      National Council for Energy Policy (CNPE)

      The CNPE was created by the Petroleum Law and it is headed by the minister of the MME. The main duties of the CNPE are:

      • to propose national policies and measures aiming to promote the rational use of energy resources;
      • to guarantee the energy supply in remote areas or areas of difficult access;
      • to periodically review the energy matrix that is applied to different regions of the country;
      • to establish guidelines for the import and export of oil and its by-products;
      • to define the areas to be offered in ANP’s bid proceedings for exploration and production of oil and natural gas; and
      • to define strategies and policies for the economic and technologic development of the oil, natural gas, other hydrocarbons and biofuels industry. 

      National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP)

      The ANP was created in 1997 by the Petroleum Law with the purpose of being the government agency in charge of regulating, contracting and supervising the economic activities related to the oil, natural gas and biofuels industry. Its main duties encompass the following:

      • to implement national policies related to oil, natural gas and biofuels;
      • to promote studies for the delimitation of the areas to be offered in bid proceedings;
      • to promote bid proceedings for the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas, executing the relevant concession agreement or PSA;
      • to authorise the activities of refining, liquefaction, regasification, shipping, processing, treatment, transportation, storage and packaging of natural gas;
      • to regulate and authorise activities related to fuel supply; and
      • to inspect the activities related to the oil, natural gas and biofuels industry, imposing administrative sanctions and fines when necessary.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. The Federal Constitution grants to the Federal Union title to mineral resources located in the Brazilian territory, which are deemed a distinct property from the land itself. The Federal Union, in turn, may allow companies to explore and produce such mineral resources, upon compensation.

      Accordingly, any company organised under Brazilian law, with headquarters and management in Brazil, may obtain an authorisation or concession for the exploration and production of mineral resources, subject to certain technical, financial and legal conditions.

      When it comes to oil and gas that are produced under a concession agreement, the ownership thereof is transferred to the concessionaire in the measurement point.

      In the production sharing regime, the ownership is transferred at the share point, where the oil and gas so produced are shared between the Federal Union and the contractors, according to the provisions of the relevant PSA. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      The Brazilian legal framework provides two different regimes for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas, namely the concession regime and the production sharing regime.

      The concession regime

      The concession regime, which was established by the Petroleum Law, has been successfully used in Brazil since the opening of the oil and gas market to private companies.

      Under the Concession Agreement that is entered into by and between ANP and the companies that win the bid proceedings, the exploration and production activities are carried out at the sole risk of the oil companies, who will have ownership over the oil and gas so produced.

      The production sharing regime

      The production sharing regime was established by the Pre-Salt Law and it is currently applicable to pre-salt areas and strategic areas.

      According to the Pre-Salt Law, Petrobras, the Brazilian national oil company, may choose to be the operator and it hold a minimum stake of 30 per cent in any consortium formed with oil companies that win the public bid , according to the proceeding outlined in question 2.

      Under the production sharing regime, oil companies shall bear all the risks of the activity, even though the production is the property of the federal government. In case of a commercial discovery, oil companies will then recover the costs and investments made (cost oil) and they will be entitled to a certain percentage of the remainder of the production (profit oil), according to the provisions of the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA).

      The parties to the PSA shall be the Federal Union, represented by the MME; ANP, as the regulatory and supervising agency; PPSA, the state-owned company that was created to manage the PSAs; and Petrobras and other possible oil companies.

      Although the execution of the PSA is usually preceded by a bid proceeding, Petrobras may also be directly hired, whenever such measure is deemed relevant for preserving national interests and the attainment of the energy policy’s goals. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. As mentioned under question 6, both the concession regime and the production sharing regime for oil and gas exploration and production shall be preceded by a public bid proceeding, which is open to Brazilian and foreign companies. In case a foreign company wins the bid proceeding, it shall set up a company organised under Brazilian law, with headquarters and management in Brazil.

      In certain exceptional circumstances, however, the CNPE may propose that Petrobras be directly contracted for the exploration and production of oil and natural gas under the production sharing regime, in order to secure the national interest and the fulfilment of the country’s energy policy.

      Moreover, when it comes to pre-salt areas or strategic areas, the Pre-salt Law provides that Petrobras shall be able to choose to be the operator and hold a minimum stake of 30 per cent in any consortium that might be formed with other oil companies for the public bid, according to the proceeding outlined in question 2. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. Local content rules were introduced by ANP in the first bidding round for exploration and production of oil and gas, which was held in 1999 (Round 1). By that time, local content was used as a criteria for assessment of bid offers.

      Until Round 4, which was held in 2002, the bidders were free to estipulate any local content percentage in their offers. However, in Rounds 5 and 6, which were held, respectively, in 2003 and 2004, ANP established minimum percentages, which would vary according to the location of the blocks (for instance, whether onshore or offshore, in shallow or deep water, etc).

      As for Round 7, which was held in 2005, ANP established not only a minimum percentage, but also a maximum global local content percentage. Additionally, the Concession Agreements contained provisions establishing local content requirements concerning a set of items used in the exploration and production phases. Such rules were maintained in the last bidding rounds.

      In the first bidding round under the production sharing regime, which was held in 2013 and was related to the Libra pre-salt field, the bid invitation only provided for minimum local content percentages, but established a similar set of items to the one that is foreseen in the Concession Agreements.

      Accordingly, during 2017, the Brazilian government announced changes in local content rules for oil and gas activities applied for the bidding rounds occurred in that year – ie, Round 14 and 2nd and 3rd Production Sharing Bidding Rounds (Pre-Salt Fields), through the publication of CNPE Resolution No. 07/2017, which were maintained for the bidding rounds occurred on 2018, thought CNPE Resolution No. 02 of 21 March 2018.

      In this sense, currently there are now three local content macro-groups for the phases of development and production, while in previous auctions there were up to 70 items and subitems. Moreover, for offshore areas (over 100 meters of water depth), local content percentages were reduced by half, when compared to the ones applicable for last bids (eg, for the exploration phase, the minimum global local content percentage required is of 18 per cent). Additionally, the calculations of fines for non-compliance with minimum local content requirements were reduced. 

      Additionally, as an attempt to assist/ maximise the projects currently conducted in the country, a new resolution was published in 2018 – ANP Resolution No. 726/2018 – aiming to modify local content rules applicable to concession/ production sharing agreements entered during Rounds 7 to 13 and 1st and 2nd Production Sharing Round, as well as for areas granted to Petrobras under the Onerous Transfer agreements (entered between 2005 and 2013). 

      According to such ANP Resolution No. 726/2018, the new reduced local content percentage (applicable to the bidding rounds occurred in 2017) could also be applicable to the aforementioned agreements entered into between 2005 and 2013 (if agreed by the oil companies), in order to extend, in a similar manner, the beneficial rules used under the last ANP bidding rounds. In this sense, an oil company may choose to amend its relevant agreements, so as to apply the new local content rules, or to request for a waiver to the ANP for the local content requirements, provided that (i) there is no local supplier for the required service or equipment; (ii) local prices or terms are too high, (iii) there are new technologies to be applied and not available in the country. Such waiver requests were also subject to public consultation, when the interested party could submit its manifestation regarding the theme. The deadline for the relevant oil companies to request such amendment to their concession agreement occurred in August 2018, being filed 280 requests. According to the information released by ANP, up to May 2019 said agency has already approved 234 waiver requests.

      Currently, ANP announced and released drafts of bidding documents for (i) the 6th Production Sharing Round and (ii) the Round 16 for concession regime. For both of the cases, local content was defined as of 18 per cent for the exploration phase. As for the phase of Development of Production, the applicable percentages are (i) 25 per cent for the well construction; (ii) 40 per cent for the collection and drainage system (Sistema de Coleta e Escoamento), and; (iii) 25 per cent applicable to the Stationary Production Unit.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      No restrictions apply to state-owned entities and local oil companies in relation to their participation in rights or concessions for oil and gas exploration and production, as long as they comply with certain requirements.

      In spite of the above, as outlined in questions 2 and 7, the Pre-Salt Law granted Petrobras certain preference privileges in relation to the pre-salt areas and strategic areas. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. The assignment of rights and obligations under the Concession Agreement may be authorised by ANP, as long as the assignee fulfils the technical, financial and legal requirements that were set forth in the most recent bid invitation approved by ANP. The same rule applies to the PSA, but in such case the approval shall be granted by the MME, even though the ANP is also consulted.

      In view of the Agreement for Technical Cooperation that ANP entered into with the Administrative Council for Economic Defence (CADE), any company interested in the assignment of the Concession Agreement or the PSA shall present (i) a technical opinion, issued by CADE, approving the asset acquisition, or (ii) a statement that such transaction is not encompassed in any of the hypothesis of article 88 of the Federal Law No. 12.529/2011, which regulates the Brazilian System for Competition Defence.

      It is worth mentioning that ANP has updated its proceedings for assignments of agreements, so as to include under its scope the bids of the 15th Bidding Concession Round, as well as the 5th Production Sharing Bidding Round, which were already concluded, since their conditions/ requirements will serve as a basis for the relevant assignments, until a new bid invitation is approved by ANP.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Oil companies operating in Brazil may use/ direct import their equipment or contract services and equipment providers to support its operations.

      Imports in Brazil are usually subject to heavy taxes, such as: (i) import tax (II); (ii) excise tax (IPI); (iii) social contributions on imports (PIS/COFINS Importacao); and (iv) the state value added tax (ICMS).

      In light of this, the special customs regime of Temporary Admission represents an important tax benefit, as it allows the permanence of foreign goods in the country – either directly imported by oil companies or by third parties under a relevant agreement that will serve as a basis for such import – for a determined period of time, with (i) total suspension of the federal taxes that would levy; or with (ii) payment of 1 per cent of such federal taxes per month of permanence in Brazil; as the case may be.

      Accordingly, Normative Ruling No. 1,600/2015 (IN 1,600/2015) contain certain exceptions in their provisions to authorise the total suspension of the federal taxes that would levy in the temporary admission of specific goods, even if such temporary admission has an economic purpose, being those: (i) goods destined to activities of research and mining of oil and natural gas, as provided by the relevant regulation, and (ii) equipment destined to the activities of transportation, movement, transference, storage or regasification of liquefied natural gas.

      In this sense, until 31 December 2017, certain assets related to the oil and gas industry could be imported with total suspension of the federal customs duties under the REPETRO regime, regulated by RFB Normative Ruling No. 1415/2013, which is a special customs regime applicable over export and import transactions of the listed assets/goods destined to activities of research and mining of oil and natural gas fields.

      In 2017, Normative Ruling No. 1,781/2017 (IN 1,781/17) was enacted, which (i) provided new regulations concerning the regime for temporary admission for economic use for goods used under activities of exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas fields (REPETRO-SPED), as well as (ii) modified certain provisions of IN 1,600/2015, being it effective until the year 2040.

      Although similar to the former REPETRO regime, which is still in force, the REPETRO-SPED has its own set of rules, allowing the importation of goods (i) temporarily and with total suspension of the customs duties (assets listed in Annex II of IN 1,781/2017, such as Drillships and FPSOs), (ii) permanently, with suspension of the federal customs duties and further conversion into exemption (Assets listed in Annex I of IN 1,781/2017), or (iii) temporarily with proportional payment of the federal customs duties (assets listed in Annexes I and II of IN 1,771/2017).

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      The government takes come mainly from taxation and the payments that the operator of an oil and gas field is obliged to make, normally consisting of (i) signature bonus, (ii) royalties, (iii) special participation, and (iv) annual surface rentals.

      The signature bonus is paid on the day the contract is signed and it corresponds to the amount offered in the bidding proposal, considering the minimum amounts established in the bid invitation. The royalties are paid on a monthly basis and may vary from 5 per cent to 10 per cent of the oil and gas production, depending on aspects such as the geological risks and production expectations. The special participation shall be paid in case of large volumes of production, respecting the conditions established in the relevant contract and in the bid invitation. Finally, companies shall pay for the area occupancy or retention on an annual basis, the amount of which is established in the bid invitation and in the corresponding agreement.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Pursuant to the Petroleum Law and the Gas Law, ANP is in charge of analysing the possibility to have certain locations declared as public utility, so as to allow the expropriation or the administrative easement thereof, whenever such areas are necessary for the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas, as well as for the construction of refineries, pipelines and terminals.

      ANP Resolution No. 44/2011 sets forth the administrative proceedings and conditions that the interested party shall observe in order to request such expropriation or easement of areas. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. The Brazilian Labour Code provides, as a general rule, that a company may employ foreign workers as long as (i) Brazilian employees correspond to at least two-thirds of the total workforce of said company; and (ii) the compensation paid to Brazilian employees is equivalent to at least two-thirds of its payroll.

      Brazilian immigration authorities usually grant temporary visas based on an employment relationship between the company and the foreign worker. Such temporary visa may be valid for up to two years and it may be renewed for the same period of time.

      Notwithstanding that, in certain circumstances, a temporary visa may be granted to a foreign worker that is not bound by a labour contract with a Brazilian company. This is the case, for instance, of expatriates who come to Brazil to work via technology transfer, for technical assistance or in emergency situations.

      With specific regard to maritime workers, it is worth mentioning Normative Resolution No. 06/2017 (RN 06/2017), issued by the National Council for Immigration, which regulates the granting of a residence authorisation to foreign crew members working aboard foreign vessels or platforms that are operating in Brazilian territorial waters, with no employment relationship with a Brazilian company.  

      Such RN 06/2017 allows for the requirement of a minimum two-thirds proportion of Brazilian employees to be waived for a certain period, depending on whether it is related to (i) supply vessels; (ii) vessels and platforms that are directly or indirectly applied in the exploration and production of mineral resources; or (iii) vessels used in coastal navigation.

      Just as an example, the crew of a foreign drilling unit may be formed by 100 per cent of foreign workers in the first 180 days of operation in Brazil. Between the 181st day and the 360th day, such crew shall have at least one-fifth of Brazilian manpower. From the 360th day until the 720th day, such proportion of Brazilian workers shall be increased to one-third. As of the 721st day, the Brazilian company shall comply with the regular rule of two-thirds of Brazilian employees.

      Finally, residence authorisations are usually granted to foreign workers that will occupy positions of directors, officers and managers of Brazilian companies. In order to grant such type of visa, Brazilian government requires a minimum investment in Brazil of 600,000 reais per permanent visa application. Such investment may be reduced to 150,000 reais if the Brazilian company commits to create at least 10 direct job positions within a two-year period.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. Although vertical integration in the Brazilian oil and gas industry usually does not suffer restrictions, there are some limitations to such a general rule.

      This is the case, for instance, of fuel distribution and retail. Pursuant to Resolution ANP 41/2013, the distributor of liquid fuels is forbidden to act as a retailer or to have equity interest in a retailing company.

      Another exception is related to the activity of natural gas shipping, which is regulated by ANP Resolution No. 51/2013. According to such Resolution, a company or consortium that has authorisation or concession for natural gas transportation shall not perform activities of natural gas shipping. Additionally, natural gas shipping shall not be executed through transportation pipelines whose concessionaire is a parent company or an affiliate of the shipping company.

      In addition to the above, it is worth noting that the players of the oil and gas industry are subject to the rules of the Brazilian competition legislation. In this sense, Law No. 12.529/2011 provides an objective list of transactions that require CADE’s approval, which are: typical merger and acquisition transactions (acquisition of companies or part of companies, shares – even acquisition of minority shares is reportable – stock and assets); and associative agreements, consortia and joint ventures, except those formed for the purposes of participation in public bids. However, in view of the Agreement for Technical Cooperation between ANP and CADE, such exception may not apply to ANP bidding rounds.

      The aforementioned Law No. 12.529/2011 establishes a pre-merger notification rule, which requires the parties to obtain prior approval from the Brazilian antitrust authorities to close a transaction. Thus, transactions cannot be implemented without clearance from the Brazilian authorities. As per said regulations, the parties will have to keep the physical structure and the competitive conditions in the markets unchanged until such final approval is granted, and any transfer of assets or any influence of one party over the other, as well as any exchange of competitive relevant information is prohibited, unless strictly necessary for the execution of the agreements related to the transaction. Non-compliance with such rules may give rise to the application of high pecuniary fines.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Pursuant to the Petroleum Law, companies may carry out oil and gas exploration and production activities either individually or through a consortium with other companies. Under a consortium agreement, a leader company shall be appointed to be responsible for the operations, being the other members joint and severally liable for the obligations undertaken under the relevant agreement.

      Each of the consortium members shall submit to ANP documentary evidence of its economic and technical capacity, as well as the registered version of the instrument that sets up the consortium.

      In addition, the parties under a consortium normally enter into a joint operating agreement (JOA), which regulates their commercial relationship, allocating control, risk and reward among them. As a private instrument, the JOA is not subject to ANP’s analysis and approval.

      The Pre-Salt Law provides that any consortium that aims to explore and produces oil and natural gas under the production sharing regime shall be formed by the bidding winners, Petrobras (mandatorily if it exercises its preference rights) and PPSA.  

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      In Brazil, oil and gas output is freely exportable, being such production subject to no limits or quotas.

      Both the Petroleum Law and the Gas Law provide that any company or consortium of companies incorporated under Brazilian law, with headquarters and management in the country, is eligible to receive authorisation to import and export oil and natural gas. Recently, ANP published Resolution 777, dated 5 April 2019, which sets forth the requirements for such authorisation to be granted, including the documents and pieces of information that the exporter shall submit. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. The relevance of environmental protection is highlighted not only in the Brazilian Federal Constitution, but also in several pieces of federal, state and municipal legislation. Besides the general rules, there are specific provisions that address the activities of oil and gas exploration and production.

      For instance, the Federal Constitution provides that those that exploit mineral resources shall be obliged to recover the environment from any degradation, as required by the relevant governmental body.

      Also, Federal Law No. 9.966/2000 deals with the preservation, control and supervision of pollution caused by oil and other harmful or dangerous substances in Brazilian territorial waters.

      Furthermore, ANP issued several administrative rules dealing with environmental aspects of the oil and gas industry, which cover matters like contamination caused by accident in operations, recovery of damaged areas, final destination of solid wastes, recycling of lubricant oil, etc.

      When it comes to environmental licences, the National Council for Environment (CONAMA) issued Resolution No. 23/1994, which sets forth specific rules for the activities of exploration and production of oil and natural gas. 

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. Such consistency with international standards is evidenced not only in the licensing requirement, but also in the environmental provisions that are foreseen both in the invitation to bid and in the Concession Agreement or PSA.  

      Such requirements exist since the first bidding round, in 1999, and are constantly updated in accordance with new legislation and with the observation of the industry’s best practices.

      For instance, as of Round 8, which was held in 2006, objective criteria have been adopted to score points for the technical qualification of the bidding participants. In Round 9, the environmental criteria included previous experience in dealing with social and environmental issues according to the operation area (ie, onshore, shallow water or deep water, etc), certification of an Integrated Management System for Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) and evidences that the bidder imposes specific HSE requirements when contracting suppliers.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      There are several provisions dealing with occupational health and safety in the Federal Constitution, the Labour Code, the Ministry of Labour rules and many other pieces of legislation. In addition to these general provisions, the ANP has also issued regulations that are specific to the oil and gas sector.

      For example, with regard to upstream activities, ANP Resolution 43/2007 introduced the Management System for Operational Safety (SGSO) for drilling and production offshore installations. The agency must approve the operation and inspect installation/ equipment used for the exploration and production of oil and gas, both onshore and offshore (drilling rigs, FPSOs, FSOs and onshore fields), being verified the application of SGSO. Additionally, ANP inspects and authorises the operation of equipment and procedures used for treatment, storage and processing of gas, as well as movement of oil and natural gas.

      As regards midstream activities – more specifically, oil refineries – ANP Resolution 05/2009 approved the Technical Regulation for Health and Safety of Oil Refineries.

      Additionally to that, on 20 December 2018, the former Ministry of Labour issued the Ordinance No. 1,186 (Ordinance No. 1,186 / 2018), which approves the Regulatory Norm No. 37 (NR-37) establishing rules regarding Health and Safety applied to Oil Platforms operating on Brazilian jurisdictional waters, from a labour standpoint.

      Briefly, NR-37 sets forth the minimum requirements for health, safety and working conditions onboard of oil platforms, in a detailed manner, establishing general obligations (such as the obligation of healthcare with personnel, emergency care measures, proper access to specific areas, living conditions, facilities and sanitary conditions, food supplying and climate control onboard) applicable to contract operators, installation operators, workers and contractors providing several outsourced services onboard of the oil platforms.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. As per Resolution No. 23/1994 of CONAMA, four environmental licences apply to the activities of oil and natural gas exploration and production, namely: previous licence for drilling, previous licence for research production, installation licence and operation licence.

      In addition to the above, Resolution CONAMA No. 350/2004 sets forth the rules for the obtainment of a specific licence for the activity of acquisition of seismic data in maritime waters and in transition zones, called a licence for seismic research.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. The three largest Brazilian federal banks, namely, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES), Banco do Brasil and Caixa Economica Federal, provide financing to companies engaged in activities related to oil and gas exploration and production.

      Also, it is worth mentioning the National Programme for the Mobilisation of the Oil and Gas Sector (PROMINP), coordinated by the MME, which has the scope to support and stimulate the participation of local companies in the oil and gas industry.

      Finally, there are certain oil and gas institutes and associations such as the Brazilian Institute of Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels (IBP) and the Brazilian Association of Oil Services Companies (ABESPETRO) that promote relevant debates and training for the industry’s players.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      No, there is no specific dispute resolution system for the oil and gas industry.

      The Petroleum Law establishes that one of the essential clauses of a Concession Agreement shall the election of conciliation and arbitration as dispute resolution methods. Accordingly, the Concession Agreement used to provide that any dispute or controversy that was not amicably solved by conciliation should be submitted to arbitration ad hoc, which would apply the Regulation of Arbitration of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law – UNCITRAL.

      Notwithstanding the above, on 2018, specifically from the Round 15 and on, the arbitration clause of the Concession Agreement was changed and currently grants the parties the right to choose the competent arbitration court, preferably with headquarters or office in Brazil. The new wording also sets forth that in case the parties do not reach an agreement with respect to the chosen arbitration court, ANP shall appoint one international arbitration court from the following: (i) the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC); (ii) the International Court of Arbitration of London, or; (iii) the Permanent Court of Arbitration of Hague.

      The Pre-Salt Law, also provides that the PSA may use conciliation and arbitration as dispute resolution methods. It is noteworthy that the PSA related to the 1st bidding round of the pre-salt areas, which was held in 2013, contained an arbitration clause that also used to predict UNCITRAL regulation applicability. However, from the 4th and 5th round on 2018, the arbitration clause was changed in the same terms of the Concession agreement of Round 15.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes, anti-corruption and anti-money laundering rules apply to the oil and gas industry in Brazil. Currently, the Brazilian legislation applicable to these matters are the following:

      Decree No. 8.420/ 2015 (which regulates the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law); Law No. 12.846/2013 (the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law); Law No. 8.429/1992 (the Brazilian Misconduct Law); Law No. 8.666/1993 (the Brazilian Procurement Law); Law No. 12.579/2012 (the Brazilian Antitrust Law); Law No. 9,613/1999 (the Brazilian Anti-Money Laundering) Law); Federal Decree No. 1.171/1994 (the “Code of Professional Ethics For Public Officials of The Federal Government); and Federal Decree No. 4.081/2002 (the Code of Ethical Conduct for Government Officials in the Presidency and Vice Presidency).

      For instance, the impacts of breach or non-compliance with the applicable regulation can range from the criminal liability for individuals involved with the crimes regarding these matters, to the administrative penalties for companies (ie, the application of fines). Furthermore, it is worth mentioning the registries of punished companies, such as the National Register of the Ineligible and Suspended Companies (CEIS) and the National Register of Punished Companies (CNEP), which consist in publicly blacklisting  companies whose involvement has already been proved in administrative proceedings.

      In this sense, according with the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law, these companies may be subject to reduction of penalties in the following cases: (i) by having implemented a compliance programme; (ii) by voluntarily reporting the harmful act and cooperating with investigations, and; (iii) by signing leniency agreements – which can decrease by up to two-thirds the amount of the fine.

      On 2016, it was enacted the Law No. 13,303 (the Public Companies Law), which regulates the public companies, mixed capital companies and its subsidiaries. Additionally to other important matters, such law deals specifically with integrity programmes, establishing the requirement for the adoption of good practices, to maintain the companies’ economic activity under strict control of internal practices with ethical, moral and legal compliance. 

      Accordingly, as a mixed-capital company and the main Brazilian player in the oil and gas industry and aiming to be aligned and comply with the requirements of the Public Companies Law, Petrobras has revised or modified its internal contracting procedures and practices, through the publication of the Petrobras Bidding and Contracts Regulations (RLCP), which entered into effect, for all Petrobras areas, in May 2018. Important changes were introduced to guarantee a contractual environment free of corruption, which changed market interactions, such as:

      • Petrobras implementing the procedures for pre-qualification, so as to identify suppliers and goods that are aligned with the company’s needs, on an objective (technical) and subjective (habilitation requirements) standpoints; and
      • the Prevention of Corruption and Integrity Due Diligence programme, in which Petrobras’ suppliers are submitted to due diligences that will result on the level of integrity risk (GRI), being it low, medium or high. It should be highlighted that parties with a high GRI may be prevented from participating in Petrobras’ bids, or even be disqualified, if their GRI is proved to be high during the course of the bid procedure.

      Further to the aforementioned measures, the company has also implemented the (i) Petrobras Programme for the Prevention of Corruption (PPPC), and (ii) the Code of Ethics and the Conduct Guide, which shall apply and be observed by its contractors. Under such anti-bribery measures, Petrobras is prevented from contracting with “blacklisted companies” (ie, those companies that have a corruption or illegal practices background).

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      Yes. After several discussions with the industry, ANP issued Resolution No. 21/2014 on 10 April 2014, aimed at regulating the operations of hydraulic fracking in non-conventional gas fields. The enactment of such Resolution was mainly motivated by the fact that the 12th bidding round, which was held in 2013, encompassed potential areas of non-conventional gas.

      Among other provisions, Resolution No. 21/2014 imposes an obligation on operators to adopt an environmental management system and to perform previous technical studies, to obtain approval for the operations. Accordingly, the environmental licences are required prior to ANP’s authorisation for hydraulic fracking activities.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

    • Brazil

      The most relevant alterations in regulations involving the Brazilian oil and gas industry relate to local content rules, the temporary admission regime for import of goods and the rules regarding health and safety applied to oil platforms operating on Brazilian jurisdictional waters, as addressed in questions 8, 15 and 30 of this chapter.

      Additionally, the government has recently announced its intention to promote an auction – in October 2019 – to release pre-salt areas currently held by Petrobras (through direct agreements entered into 2010) to the operation of other oil companies. The approval of the intended procedure is currently under the analysis of the Brazilian Federal Court of Auditors.

      Last verified on Tuesday 14th May 2019

Latin Lawyer gives you a fantastic platform to promote your legal expertise to our extensive readership base

Become an author

Contributing editors