Subjective pricing evaluations and competition to blame for most M&A disputes, argee panellists

Panellists speaking at this year’s Latin Lawyer-GAR Arbitration summit agreed the subjective nature of evaluating a company’s value and a "buy the company yesterday" culture is why so many M&A deals are ending in arbitration.

Subjective pricing evaluations and competition to blame for most M&A disputes, argee panellists Richard Lorenzo, Paula Forgioni, Anil Shivdasani, Grant Hanessian and Felipe Ossa , photo by Chris Lavado

“Ten, maybe 20 years ago, when a prospective buyer wanted to acquire a company, they would conduct an actual real due diligence process,” said Claro & Cía partner Felipe Ossa. “Those were simpler times because now everybody is in a hurry,” Ossa added, claiming that due diligence has been reduced to “just reviewing a few documents in a virtual data room.” This is because many companies are trying to gain an edge over their competition by using the valuations provided in the reps and warranties documents to rush the due diligence process and will then dispute the value later, he said.

In this article

These firms have professional notices in the Latin Lawyer 250



Latin Lawyer Live 9th Annual Private Equity


Latin Lawyer Live 5th Annual Labour & Employment






Alfonso Reymond Larraín and Rodrigo Riquelme Yanez

Reymond & Cía


Fernando Marcondes, Ricardo Medina Salla, Marlon Shigueru Ushiro Ieiri, Adriana Regina Sarra de Deus and Juliana Yumi Shiina Morato

LO Baptista

All Reference



The Guide to Infrastructure and Energy Investment

How to Build Up a Region: Development Banks and Multilateral Financing

Thomas Hechl and Vanessa Pinto Villa

Hogan Lovells LLP

The Role of Project Finance in Developing a Region: Trends and Considerations

Andrés Arnaldos Montaner , Daniel D Bartfeld , Jaime E Ramirez and Roland Estevez

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
All Guides